TPUSA reports that the surgeon tells them that Charlie’s neck bone stopped a .30-06, so there was no exit wound. “It was an absolute miracle … he’s like the man of steel.” Read it for yourself:
As someone experienced with many firearms and many calibers, the story of Charlie Kirk’s magic bullet is impossible. There is not once chance in a million. I have done a test that proves it.
I once did a penetration test with a .30-06. For comparison, I also tested an AR-15 and 9mm on the same target.
I made the target by placing hardwood boards inside a new steel garbage can, and I rolled up a thick shag carpet behind it to hold it in place. Each board was 3/4-inch thick. There were 8 boards IIRC (this was over 30 years ago).
I shot an armor piercing .30-06 bullet from the Korean war, and I shot a modern hunting round, which I think was 165 grains, and which was soft and designed to expand.
The 9mm FMJ went through one layer of steel and its nose was barely sticking out of the first board, so it penetrated one board.
The AR-15 bullet (5.56) went through one layer of steel and 4 boards.
The .30-06 hunting bullet went straight through the entire target, and the jagged exit hole was about 1×2 inches.
The .30-06 AP bullet penetrated straight through the entire target and the exit hole was a tiny round hole the same as the entry hole.
If that is not convincing enough, consider that grok agrees:
It is obvious that the establishment narrative cannot be true and is thus some kind of cover up.
Further evidence of a cover up is the disinfo campaign. The algorithm is now suppressing honest independent thinkers while flooding the comments with shills and dummies—flooded even when there are zero shares, which reveals a coordinated effort outside the platform.
The large variety of pro-establishment junk theories is another tell. Smart people can see right through them, but the public has been dumbed down for decades, so the Apex Players now think a flood of junk theories will be effective.
One of my favorites is the dismissal of my penetration tests for not being done on a human neck, while parroting that a .30-06 sometimes does not penetrate an Elk torso! An Elk torso! An enormous animal with enormous bones vs. a tiny human neck with tiny bones. I’ll bet these shills and dummies have never heard of a false equivalence fallacy.
These dummies add that “Elk are still walking around with a .30-06 lodged in them.”, which they don’t know is weapons grade propaganda designed to trivialize the power of the .30-06. Nor do they know that an Elk might sometimes live for hours, or even weeks with .30-06 lodged in it, but it can no longer go about its life in any meaningful sense. It is dying a slow and painful death.
I rarely shame people for being dummies, but not only is this case obvious, but this cover up is providing cover for genocide. Charlie Kirk was obviously killed by/for Israel, who had method, motive, opportunity, and history. You see, Charlie Kirk was potentially just hours away from destroying the scourge of Zionism, which he told them two days before they killed him. If you provide cover for genocide, expect to be shamed.
My overall favorite junk theory is that the same exact thing happened to MLK. A .30-06 was deflected down his spine and did not exit his body. I’m not kidding. That’s the establishment narrative. So dummies ask why couldn’t it have also happened to Charlie Kirk.
The two most high profile political assassinations since JFK both have the same BS narrative? Now the Apex Players are just messing with us. At least with MLK, it wasn’t just the neck. Forensics says that after being deflected down by the jawbone, the bullet entered King’s neck at a 30 degree downward angle (vs. 10 degree downward angle when entering Charlie Kirk’s neck). There is maybe a 2% chance that could have happened to the bullet that struck MLK, but now they don’t even try. It’s like the Hunger Games, where the Capitol likes to rub our powerlessness in our face.
Consider that this one other case was a conspiracy from beginning to end, so none of the establishment narrative can be trusted. Here are two videos by James Corbett explaining the MLK conspiracy.
https://t.co/hjWlfzcz5h — https://corbettreport.com/interview-1272-william-pepper-reveals-who-really-killed-mlk
https://t.co/D69SqdOBJ6 — https://corbettreport.com/flashback-pepper
One last theory is not exactly dumb, but it is far less probable than it may first appear.
Those who know about hand loading ammo will know that it is possible to load any amount of any powder you want into a cartridge you hand loaded, and thus one could make a weak .30-06 cartridge. Instead of a muzzle velocity of 2800 fps, it might be 700 fps, and thus have a 50% probability of not penetrating a human neck. Of course, there is really no reason to do that, because such a bullet would shoot 89 inches low at 150 yards instead of six inches low. If one knew about guns and wanted a weak but accurate bullet, then one would use a .22 magnum, which would also allow a smaller lighter gun.
The FBI claims it has other rounds from Tyler’s gun, so if Tyler had hand loaded some weak rounds, they would have mentioned that so that they would not look like fools, but they did not mention it.
Already we see that this theory is highly improbable, but not improbable enough that we can definitively say it didn’t happen—at least, not if you have any faith in the FBI, so let’s think it through and see whether no amount of faith is sufficient.
Tyler learned about the event about 3 days before, during which time he would have to work up the resolve to do it, then scope out the facility, then decide how he would do it, then acquire the skill and the equipment to engrave casings, then engrave the casings, then acquire the skill and equipment to hand load rounds, then hand load rounds that could only penetrate one neck (instead of 6-9 necks), then find a range at least 150 yards long, then practice at the range with his bullets that would have had a radically different trajectory than a standard .30-06, then hand write a confession, then carry out the mission.
Now what are the odds of that narrative being true? Like one in a million? One in a billion?
[UPDATE 11/30/25] Oh, my. Now the people are being fed the narrative of Tyler buying subsonic (1050 fps) .30-06 rounds. The odds are similar to the hand loaded narrative. Although such bullets do exist: 1) they are very rare because they are such a bad idea, 2) they have to be mail ordered, for which there was no time in his schedule 3) the only reason to use them is if one is also using a suppressor, which Tyler’s gun did not have, 4) subsonic rounds designed for that purpose, like a .300 BLK, would have the same effect, be commonly available, and allow a much smaller lighter gun, 5) such rounds would still have a 95% chance of penetrating a human neck, and 6) the FBI has made no mention of Tyler using subsonic rounds, which they would definitely do if they did not want to look foolish. So again—astronomically unlikely.
[UPDATE 12/18/25] On 12/17/25, Candace Owens was used to feed us the newest establishment narrative.
Now dummies are supposed to believe that a highly frangible bullet was used—not just the kind that fragments, but the kind that “turns to powder” in soft tissue, and there is one such cartridge that is commonly available for a .30-06, so if this had been the establishment narrative in the beginning, then they wouldn’t be dummies. So, why are they dummies now? First, a little background.
The establishment must have spent millions of dollars for the last three months mobilizing an online army of bots and shills to attack anyone who deviates from the original establishment narrative, which was that the doctor violated HIPAA to confirm that Charlie Kirk’s tiny neck bone stopped a .30-06 and that the bullet was found just beneath his skin. Then they changed their story and said the bullet bounced around inside him and was found just beneath the skin.
Many, such as myself, proved that the establishment narrative was impossible, and when the online army they mobilized to silence us did not work (after an extraordinary 3-month disinformation campaign), they used the most trusted conspiracy investigator on this topic to feed us a new establishment narrative.
Only dummies believe the new establishment narrative of the bullet that turned to powder because of a few obvious flaws in this new narrative:
- If a bullet that turns to powder was used, then the establishment would not have spent millions of dollars and 3 months of time to field an online army of bots and shills to push the original impossible narrative.
- If a bullet that turns to powder was used, then the entire establishment would not have told us for three months that they found the bullet just beneath Charlie Kirk’s skin.
- The only commercially available frangible bullet has the same weight and velocity as a standard bullet, so all that massive energy would have been absorbed by Charlie Kirk’s neck, but we can see that didn’t happen (i.e. no corresponding explosion or jerking motion).
- The human neck is tiny, so such a bullet would have left multiple exit wounds/ruptures in addition to the entry hole.
- Such a bullet is uncommon to own because it is such a bad idea to dump a bunch of powder throughout meat that you intend to eat.
- Such a bullet is uncommon to own because the whole point of owning a .30-06 is for its impressive penetration capabilities.
👇
8https://youtu.be/MbaQadkqkzI