It has been known for more than 100 years that the natural immunity resulting from infection enables one’s immune system to prevent serious symptoms for decades if one is reinfected, so that is what everyone should have expected from the natural immunity conferred by Covid from the beginning.
The only caveat is that if sars-cov-2 is a bioweapon and was released intentionally, then immunity may not behave normally, so we should be open to that possibility, but it does not appear to have been a factor thus far. In fact, we know that natural immunity to sars-cov (a.k.a. sars-cov-1) still existed in 2020 after 17 years. We also know that natural immunity to sars-cov-1 recognizes some of the proteins on sars-cov-2, and thus provides some immunity to sars-cov-2 as well.
Although some vaccines can come close to natural immunity, the three Covid vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer, J&J), which are still being injected under the American EUA as of January 2022, are very different from traditional vaccines, so one should investigate how their effectiveness compares to traditional vaccines (and how their safety compares to traditional vaccines).
One critical difference is that all of the EUA vaccines, as well as a fourth one from Astra Zeneca, which did not get approved by the American EUA, all train one’s immune system to recognize a single spike protein–the same spike protein.
The way immunity works is that one’s immune system initially learns about a new pathogen when antigen presenting cells (APCs) carry an antigen (fragment of a pathogen) back to your B memory cells, which live in your lymph system. The APC also tells you B cell where it found the antigen. An antigen could be a spike protein, or some other protein in/on the virus, or it could be something else like an oligosaccharide. Each B cell that receives an APC with a payload will try to construct an antigen-specific immunoglobulin (antibody) that should match that antigen fragment. Those antibodies will have two prongs that can grab the pathogen by that fragment, and they will have one opposing prong that will bind to any of several passing immune cells, such as T cells, which will destroy the antibody and its payload.
Some B cells will have better luck than others in producing an effective antibody. As more B cells get more antigen fragments, the probability of more effective antibodies increases. B cells (a.k.a. B memory cells) remember how to produce those antibodies, which is the key to long term immunity.
As the pathogen continues to replicate exponentially, your immune system keeps repeating this process in order to discover which antibodies can kill the pathogen, and produce enough of them before the pathogen kills you.
The B cells that saved you will not only have been good at killing the pathogen, but will also have been good at recognizing the pathogen by many (perhaps all) of its proteins. Knowledge of how to produce the antibodies that saved you will be stored in your B-cells for the rest of your life; whereas the antibodies that did the fighting naturally disappear after a few months.
The first thing to note is that anyone should have been able to deduce that when the global establishment began citing the disappearance of antibodies after natural infection as proof that natural immunity only lasted two or three months …. they were lying.
The second thing to note requires the very common background knowledge that if a therapy kills off a pathogen that it can recognize and fight, but does not kill off enough of them to make the pathogen extinct, then mutations (variants) that the therapy cannot recognize and/or fight will become widespread–hence the existence of antibiotic resistant bacteria.
Therefore, the second thing to note is that as soon as the vaccines arrived, it was known that they only recognized the same single spike protein, and thus one should expect mutations in that spike protein to become widespread because of that evolutionary pressure caused by the vaccines. However, those mutations were blamed on the unvaccinated, so anyone should have been able to deduce that blaming the unvaccinated was a lie.
The third thing to note is that such mutations (variants) would make it hard for the immunity conferred by the EUA vaccines to recognize that spike protein on the future variants they were creating, whereas natural immunity could still recognize the pathogen by its other proteins, and thus anyone should have been able to deduce in 2020 that natural immunity was superior, and that the claim by the global establishment that vaccine immunity was superior was a lie.
We can deduce all of this if we think for ourselves and if we do not have the same conflicts of interest as establishment experts, but wouldn’t it be nice if we also had some data to back up our rock solid deductions? Well …. we do.
A study of natural immunity vs. vaccine immunity in the whole population Israel proves that natural immunity prevents subsequent reinfection 6-13 times better than the vaccine, and that natural immunity prevents hospitalization 27 times better than the vaccine. As you can guess, the results of this and similar studies have been suppressed by the global establishment, which is tantamount to another lie.
Now we can make another solid deduction based solely on the issue of natural immunity v. the vaccine: It was never about safety.
To Read Next: